The law is a national standard
determining what is right and what is wrong in the government’s eyes. In practice, it essentially is a country’s
ethics. In Edward Jones’s novel, The
Known World, every character has his or her set of morals. By his usage of the word “right,” Jones compares
people’s beliefs and actions to the law, thereby demonstrating the subjectivity
of supposedly common values.
The laws and customs of the United
States are set-up as the basis for comparison by Jones’s use of the word “right.” It is made apparent early into the novel that
people are aware of how they are expected to behave. For example, a slave woman who had become
worse at her job after her children were sold received whippings meant for her
to start doing, “what was right and proper” (27). Right in this sense conveys the feeling that
the woman behaved inappropriately in this situation, implying that she should
have been doing something else instead of slacking off at her job. Having a correct procedure for everything means
that there is a clear distinction between good and bad. In creating this dichotomy, Jones allows the
law to become the basis for determining what actions are acceptable. Indeed, John Skiffington embodies this
statement when he makes a claim: “I take
no side but the right one” (158). Skiffington,
the town’s sheriff, acts as an agent for the law of the United States to be
carried out under his jurisdiction. By
saying he exclusively takes the “right” side, he suggests that the law is also
considered right in the same sense.
Therefore, everything that is against the law can be considered wrong
and there is no grey area in the middle of right and wrong.
Jones subsequently uses the word
“right” to compare the characters’ values to the law, revealing the underlying
differences in their morals. A major
example of this is when Oden, Travis, and Barnum stop Augustus at night. Augustus claimed he was “only doing what [he]
got a right to do” (212). He uses
“right” to indicate that his actions, merely passing through the road at night,
were allowed under the law. This
statement is put against the actions of the keepers of the law, specifically
Travis. When Barnum objects to Travis
eating the papers, Travis tells him “right ain’t got nothin to do with it”
(212). Travis, an enforcer of the law, thereby
claimed that the law did not apply to his own actions by using the word “right”. However, Augustus had earlier said that the
law was what allowed the black man to go as he pleased. This demonstrates that both characters viewed
the law in separate ways. August felt
that he operated within its bounds, earlier defined as acting “good,” whereas
Travis thought that he acted outside of them, in the “bad” zone. Thus, Jones had distinguished the characters’
set of morals via his usage of the word “right.”
No comments:
Post a Comment